Overall Standard Rating Average : 3.86
Internal Rating 3.6
Indicator 4.1: Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating 4
Sub-indicator 4.1.1: Clearly defined policies, processes and procedures ensure that school leaders have access to, hire, place and retain qualified professional and support staff.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
POLICIES, PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
HIRE, PLACE
Sub-indicator 4.1.2: School leaders use a formal, systematic process to determine the number of personnel necessary to fill all the roles and responsibilities necessary to support the school purpose, educational programs and continuous improvement.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Sub-indicator 4.1.3: Sustained fiscal resources are available to fund all positions necessary to achieve the purpose and direction of the school.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Indicator 4.2: Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating 3.7
Sub-indicator 4.2.1: Instructional time, material resources and fiscal resources are focused solely on supporting the purpose and direction of the school.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Instructional time:
Material:
Sub-indicator 4.2.2: Instructional time is protected in policy and practice.
Sub-indicator 4.2.3: School leaders exhaust every option to secure material and fiscal resources to meet the needs of all students.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
General Budget Confidential Information (only printed evidence)
Audit Report Fiscal Year 2016
Operational Plan 2016-2017
10 Year Projection Confidential Information (only printed evidence)
Sub-indicator 4.2.4: School leaders measurably demonstrate that instructional time, material resources and fiscal resources are allocated so that all students have equitable opportunities to attain challenging learning expectations.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Instructional time:
Fiscal resources:
Material Resources
Sub-indicator 4.2.5: Efforts toward the continuous improvement of instruction and operations concentrate on achieving the school’s purpose and direction.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Continuous Improvement-Instructional:
Continuous Improvement-Operations:
Operational Plan 2016-2017
10 Year Projection Confidential Information (only printed evidence)
Indicator 4.3 Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating : 3.8
Sub-indicator 4.3.1: School leaders have adopted or created clear expectations for maintaining safety, cleanliness and a healthy environment and have shared these definitions and expectations with stakeholders.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Sub-indicator 4.3.2: School personnel and students are accountable for maintaining these expectations.
Sub-indicator 4.3.3: Measures are in place that allow for continuous tracking of these conditions.
Sub-indicator Rating: 3.5
Sub-indicator 4.3.4: Improvement plans are developed and implemented by appropriate personnel to continuously improve these conditions.
Sub-indicator Rating: 4.0
Sub-indicator 4.3.5: The results of improvement efforts are systematically evaluated regularly.
Indicator 4.4: Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating 3.8
Sub-indicator 4.4.1: All students and school personnel have access to an exceptional collection of media and information resources necessary to achieve the educational programs of the school.
Sub-indicator 4.4.2: Qualified personnel are available to assist students and school personnel in learning about the tools and locations for finding and retrieving information.
Indicator 4.5: Overall Rating Average 3
Internal Rating : 3.3
Sub-indicator 4.5.1: The technology infrastructure meets the teaching, learning and operational needs of all stakeholders.
Sub-indicator 4.5.2: School personnel develop and administer needs assessments and use the resulting data to develop and implement a technology plan to continuously improve technology services and infrastructure.
Indicator 4.6: Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating 3.5
Sub-indicator 4.6.1: School personnel implement a clearly defined process to determine the physical, social and emotional needs of each student in the school.
Sub-indicator 4.6.2: School personnel provide or coordinate programs to meet the needs of all students.
Sub-indicator 4.6.3: Measures of program effectiveness are in place, and school personnel use the data from these measures to evaluate all programs.
Sub-indicator 4.6.4: Improvement plans related to these programs are designed and implemented to more effectively meet the needs of all students.
Indicator 4.7 Overall Rating Average 4
Internal Rating : 3.8
Sub-indicator 4.7.1: School personnel implement a clearly defined, systematic process to determine the counseling, assessment, referral, educational and career planning needs of all students.
Sub-indicator 4.7.2: School personnel provide or coordinate programs necessary to meet the needs of all students.
Sub-indicator 4.7.3: Valid and reliable measures of program effectiveness are in place, and school personnel use the data from these measures to regularly evaluate all programs.
Summary of ISO indicators: Learning Center indicators for the 2015-2016 School Year.
Next Steps in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: analysis of the pilot program for MTSS and next steps for implementation.
Progress Monitoring Case Study: analysis of data from AIMSweb platform to adjust interventions.
Annual Report - indicates the number of scholarships awarded and admittance to colleges.
External Review of Learning Center Programs and Services: summary of observations and recommendations regarding instructional services by Special Education consultants -- Dr. Ed Ellis, Dr. Lou Denti and Dr. Kevin Feldman.